Well, I have been thinking hard about this for a while and I've made a more informed decision. OLL + PLL is faster than COLL + EPLL once you factor in the time spent on VHF2L. I know I said it was about equal before but I've been testing and it seems clear. This has kind of made me lose confidence in ZBLL, but I work that out to be even with OLL + PLL. I'm really not sure what to think of this because it's a rather large blow to my idea of ZB. I'm seriously considering learning ZBF2L to help out the speed even more, though I'm not looking forward to learning the algorithms.
I'm thinking the best way to go about with learning ZBLL (learning in the easiest progression) is:
2-Look COLL (using 2-Look OLL to orient, then COLL)
VHF2L
Some ZBLL and ZBF2L here and there
2GLL
ZBF2L
ZBLL
At least that's the organization I plan to follow. Though right now I'm working with an all-nighter so there's no guarantee any of this is rational.
No comments:
Post a Comment